Tips for the ‘bureaucratic’ writer
Whether or not you’ve taken our tongue-in-cheek style test, if your writing makes even politicians sound lucid, please read on.
Here’s what our three ‘B’ test sentences look like when put together:
‘To the company’s regret, the issues its clients have been experiencing were due to a quality issue relating to the delivery of the IT-based system that is currently utilised in-house, and a review to identify lessons and learning points is now ongoing. Going forward, cancellation of the agreement can only be delivered upon receipt of written notification of a client’s intention to cancel three days prior to the cancellation. Should any client wish to comment on this issue, feedback submissions can be made via the company’s IT-based communications interface.’
At best you might be seen as injecting a tone of respectful formality, but mostly this style of writing is just pompous and, let’s face it, miserable to read.
So, whether sounding self-important or trying to be obscure is your goal then give yourself a gold star – you’ve cracked it. Conversely, if you’re trying to attract the attention of readers who are in no way obliged to give you it, here are some tips on how to win them over.
*Blame others – Taking responsibility when things go wrong, especially when it is not our fault, earns respect. There is, though, a solution where no-one need take the blame and that is by using the depersonalising passive voice – e.g. the breakdown was caused by a fault in the IT system.
____________________________
By applying these techniques here’s what our Model Answer (three ‘D’ test sentences) looks like:
‘We apologise for the unfortunate break in service, which was caused by problems with our IT system. Should you wish to cancel the agreement, under our new policy you must inform us in writing three days in advance. Email us now – we would love to hear what you think.’